The Trinity: Understanding God's Love, His Plan of Salvation, and Christian Relationships

The doctrine of Trinity or Trian God was originated in pagan Rome under the rulership of king Constantine foumder of Roman Catholisism , a great persecutor of genuine christians (300 AD). And on year 320 AD his followers, the so called early church fathers replaced the Apostles baptism in water in the name of Jesus Christ to the name of Triun God, father, son, holy spirit ! ( Mat.28.19). Never in the Bible that the Apostles baptized in the name of Trinity. JESUS said to His disciples before He ascended to heaven to baptized in the "NAME" (singular) not "NAMES" (plural). Therefore, the three Titles of GOD not Persons has "ONE" common 'NAME' !? By the way JESUS said on the Name of the Father, of thr Son, of the Holy Spirit ! Then, what is the Name of the Father? Of the Son, we know JESUS! How about the Name of the Holy Spirit? Peter confirm the Name of the Father and of the Holy Spirit. After the ascension of JESUS in heaven, two weeks later on the upper room Peter and the other apostles were baptized in the Holy Ghost , Peter went out the street and under the heavy anointing of the Holy Spirit (Spirit of Truth) boldly preach repentance and baptism in the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sin (Acts 2:38). Did Peter disobeyed the Lord JESUS or he just forget the command given by the LORD in Mat.28:19? No, Peter under the control of the LORD's Spirit can never commit mistake on that moment! Therefore, the Name of the Father and the Holy Ghost is JESUS! JESUS is from the Greek word SAVIOR. There is no other Savior exept GOD (Isa.43:11). Therefore the Name of one GOD is JESUS . GOD has only acted three important character role in behalf of humanity as the Father in creation, as the Son in redemption, as th Holy Spirit in regeneration! Is it cleary my dear trinitarian fanatics?!

"In the spirit of the pioneers of the Seventh-day Adventist church, the authors of this book firmly hold the following conviction: if we cannot support any teaching biblically, we do not want it." (The Trinity pg. 10) "We will be very candid with our readers--if it is not biblical we do not want it, even if the vast majority of authorities in the religious world endorse it (including Adventist pioneers and the theologians of 'Babylon')." (The Trinity pg.11) "The only way for the pioneers in their context to effectively separate Scripture from tradition was to abandon every doctrine not clearly supported from the Bible alone. Thus they initially rejected the traditional doctrine of the Trinity, which clearly contained elements not evident in Scripture." (The Trinity pg. 202) "To whom should we direct our petitions and adoration in personal devotions and corporate worship?...But what about direct prayer to the Holy Spirit? While we have no clear example of or direct command to pray to the Spirit in Scripture, doing so does have, in principle, some implicit biblical support. If the Spirit is indeed divine and personal and He interacts in all sorts of direct personal ways (bringing conviction, healing, transforming grace, granting gifts, etc.), it only seems logical that God's people can pray directly to and worship the Holy Spirit...In sum--if the persons of the Godhead are truly one in nature, character, and purpose, then it seems only logical and practical to address appropriate petitions and praises to any one of the heavenly Trio at any given time and situation." (The Trinity pg. 272, 273 emphasis supplied). I read this book with eager excitement, yet was sadly disappointed. The writers of this book seem disingenuous at least, or outright dishonest at worst. Is it really possible to claim strict Biblical "proof" of the modern Adventist version of the Trinity doctrine, while at the same time candidly admitting there is "no example of" anyone in the bible ever praying to or worshipping the Holy Spirit? Nor, is there any "direct command" anywhere in Scripture that we should worship or pray to the Holy Spirit! In other words no one in the entire Bible ever worshiped or prayed to the Holy Spirit, but we are all told to do so anyway! For many people, praying to and worshipping the Holy Spirit "seems logical and practical." Yet, praying to Mary and worshipping dead saints seems very logical and practical for over a billion people. Now, everyone is entitled to their own belief or opinion, but why try to cram this new speculative opinion about the Trinity down our throats? Some may say, "the writers of this book are not being dogmatic about their opinions and speculations, they are just trying to make sense of all the Trinity confusion." Yet, the practical definition of dogmatic dogmatism is when Pastors are fired, and laypersons disfellowshipped from Adventist churches because of variant interpretations of the "Trinity" as defined by the 28 Fundamental beliefs. If Adventist's are not required to strictly adhere to only one interpretation of the Trinity doctrine, then why make it a test of fellowship in the first place? In fact, the greatest irony of all is that "The Trinity" book belittles the early Adventist pioneer's non-trinitarian views while praising the development of modern Adventist trinitarianism as the only Biblical and legitimate form of the doctrine. Did you catch that? Modern Adventism claims that all Christian trinitarian creeds contain elements of "Greek philosophy," unbiblical speculation and human tradition. Therefore, modern Adventism cannot subscribe or endorse ANY Christian Trinity creed, and by definition, would be classified as non-Trinitarian by them all. Now that's irony. Even though modern Adventism has evolved its own unique "Trinitarian" perspective, the Adventist church has always been non-Trinitarian.